Showing posts with label Case study. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Case study. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 1, 2017

Case Study Method in Business Administration - Management


Important Points from

An Introduction to the Use of Cases

Arthur Stone Dewing
Article in Book, 1931

Cases should be used as education method in business education with the clear consciousness that the purpose of business education is not command of established precedents as in law or uncritical allegiance to experience of others, but the development of ability to think through the facts and come out with some intelligent solution. In business this solution must have adequate profit and therein lies the individual success and contribution to the economic prosperity of the country.

Teaching by case method results in the class in a combination of possibilities, probabilities and expedients. Possibilities are based on combination of intricate facts presented in the case (when coupled with various theories in diverse subjects of business management), probabilities refer to reactions of others in the class, and expedients are the various proposals and acts by the presenter to bring about the responses in other that lead to a definite end (agreement with his proposal).

Thinking happens when one is confronted with new situations and thinking prompts action. Cases provide thinking opportunity to students.

Important Points from

Because Wisdom Can't Be Told

Charles I. Gragg
Harvard Alumni Bulletin, 1940

Benefits of The Case Study System


The case study system in business administration course initiates students into ways of independent thought and responsible judgment. Case studies provide real current situations and place the student in an active role to decide the business action and to present it to a peer group of students for their accepting the same. The peer group may act various roles of superiors, peers, and even subordinates when they criticize the decision from various angles. It provides the student presenter the occasion to deal constructively with their contemporaries some of them being elders to him and may be having experience in that business. The faculty is also one critic.

Case studies force students to actually make decisions which can be implemented by them. Thus the learning becomes active. Lectures are passive learning unless they are followed by exercises. But the exercises may not provide the type of environment that case study provides wherein the student who made the decision has to present to rest of students and get their agreement or modify his decision in response to the comments and suggestions by others.

Business management is both technical and human matter. Business administrators and managers have to understand how people in various roles in the total business system - Suppliers, Producers, Sellers, Consumers, Investors, Bankers, Government agencies, Media - will react to specific business actions. Case study method provides an opportunity to the students to observe the reactions of his fellow students to the proposals that he made as a part of case presentation.

The case method also presents an opportunity to learn from others and modify thoughts. This provides a group discussion platform to agree to certain features of a proposals and to disagree with certain parts of proposals and make an effort to arrive at a consensus.

Case Provides Raw Material


Case provides the raw material with which the student develops his decision. The case class is not meant for absorption of knowledge alone but it forces the student to think independently using his accumulated knowledge up to that point in time and present it to other without any fear or shyness.

Business education has to provide the ability to see vividly the potential relationships between the facts of the situation related to both things and people and make judgment. The judgments have to be communicated to other organization members to initiate agreement and action.

Business education has to accelerate the progress of a candidate to a position of responsibility in comparison to a person who enters business without MBA. Hence the objective of business education has to be to prepare the student to occupy a position say within five years which the person without MBA may take 10 ten years.

The lecture method may also provide similar inputs. But a dynamic process wherein the student himself takes the decision and feels confident about it is much more powerful than the passive learning.

The case method may bring out some innovative solutions from the students with which all the members of the class including the faculty members may be in agreement. This calls for real appreciation of the presenter and such appreciations will make students more confident in their real life assignments. They develop the ability of creative problem solving.

Case Studies Do not Provide Real Experience with Profits and Losses - But They Provide Simulated Experience without the Risk


There are some critics who say the case does not provide the exact replica of the real situation and students do not actually implement their decisions and incur profits and losses. Gragg agrees with the criticism and states that anything except experience can be exactly like experience. But the case method provides a training period where risk is eliminated. The student gets acquainted with process of making real decisions without risk to himself. In the course of his education, he is provided the opportunity to live through a number of diverse real situations which if he has to experience in real life would take a life time. Through the case study training, he develops analytical and synthesizing experience that will provide a basis for comparison when he is asked to do a real life problem and implement it.



Important Points from

Tough-Mindedness and The Case Method

Malcolm P. McNair

From an address given on February 25, 1953 at the first meeting of participants of 23rd Advanced Management Program at the Harvard Business School

Case discussion is an exercise in decision-making. For learning through case discussions, tough-mindedness is necessary to analyse the facts and issues following logical paths of reasoning and judgment to come out with appropriate decisions and conclusions. The toughness is intellectual to persist with the learning effort till an adequate comprehension is made of the situation described. How much effort the student has to make depends on his reaching that comprehension.

The instructor's job is to see that men in the class settle down to a tough-minded analysis and do not become content with a superficial analysis.

The principal value of case method is not facts and theories accumulated. No doubt the student will accumulate them by digging the case and other materials available to him in library (and presently on internet). But value accrues in the power that they will develop in digging now for the digging they have to do in actual situations. The mastery of decision making is the purpose of the entire case based curriculum. Case method provides you the power to analyze a new situation, to formulate an actionable program for positive outcome, and carry out the program through people.

Businesses can hire many people who solve problems that have one right answer. But the pay more to people who have the capability to find the best solution appropriate to the situation when many alternatives are possible.  This requires creativity, judgment and leadership to implement the solution.

The essence of profit is managing risk and uncertainty. The human spirit must always try to do good things without shunning the risk of failure. (We say there must be expected profit in a venture not the possibility of loss. Possibility of loss is always there and we must bear the loss always psychologically as well as the ability of ours to live within reduced means.)


Updated 4 February 2017, 28 January 2017



Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Toyota Traditions - A compilation


Toyoda Precepts:
The base of the Global Vision of Toyota Motors
http://www.toyota-global.com/company/toyota_traditions/company/apr_2012.html


Every challenge in Toyota's path would result in the creation of a valuable asset:
Financial Crisis and Toyota Motor Sales Co., Ltd.'s Foundation
http://www.toyota-global.com/company/toyota_traditions/company/dec2009_feb2010.html

Visions Define Toyota's Path
http://www.toyota-global.com/company/toyota_traditions/company/nov2008_feb2009_2.html


Since TMS was first established in 1957, its tireless pursuit of quality across all areas of business, including products, design, engineering, production, management and dealerships, has been the key to the company's successful brand-building in the United States.
The 50th anniversary of Toyota in the U.S.
http://www.toyota-global.com/company/toyota_traditions/company/may_jun_2007.html

Monday, April 16, 2012

Nokia Comes Up From Behind in India in Multi-Sim Card Mobile Phone Category

Nokia had a market share of 70%+ in India in 2005. It has slipped to 31% in 2011. So naturally, there is gloom in Nokia's ranks. But there is a success achieved by Nokia recently that is giving fresh hope and confidence to Nokia management that they can improve things now.

The success story was scripted in the case of dual sim card phones. It became a successful category in India and Nokia had no product in this category for more than two and half years. Nokia introduced it in June 2011 only and emerged as the category leader by October 2011 with a share of 21.9%. This success is helping Nokia in other categories also in India. Also, even global mood is improving due to this marketing and new product introduction success. As we all know, presently, Nokia is going through a troublesome period globally.




How Nokia Emerges as a Market Leader in Crowded Dual SIM Market?
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/features/brand-equity/how-nokia-emerges-as-leader-in-crowded-dual-sim-market/articleshow/12614070.cms
Economic Times Brand Equity Article - 11 April 2012

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Google - Does It Need a Different Corporate and Organization Structure?

"Rivals get the jitters when Google's nonsearch products grab headlines. But a close look shows that so far, there's not a market leader among them." What is the reason? Does Google need a different corporate and organization structure?

What is your analysis? Give it in comment

Google launched Nexus one mobile phone on 5th January 2010. It is available for online sale through http://www.google.com/phone/?locale=en_US&s7e= (http://www.google.com/phone). One more product from google. But Google is not known for its marketing successes in nonsearch products.
A July 2006 article in Business Week with the title "So Much Fanfare, So Few Hits" (http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_28/b3992051.htm) summarizes and depicts the inability of google to market its products  well. "Rivals get the jitters when Google's nonsearch products grab headlines. But a close look shows that so far, there's not a market leader among them." What is the reason? Does Google need a different corporation and organization structure?
________________________________________________________________________________________

Company Overview and Products

Founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin named the search engine they built "Google," a play on the word "googol," the mathematical term for a 1 followed by 100 zeros. The name reflects the immense volume of information that exists, and the scope of Google's mission: to organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful.
In the overview provided by the company, it identifies search, ads, apps, and mobile as main categories of its products and services.
But at the moment google has a vast product portfolio. Observe this remark by webopedia(http://www.webopedia.com/quick_ref/Google_Services.asp):
"In 1996, Google started out as a research project by Larry Page and Sergey Brin, two Ph.D. students at Stanford University. In 1998, Page and Brin — while continuing to perfect their technology — bought a terabyte of disks at bargain prices and built their own computer housings in Page's dorm room, which became Google's first data center. In 1999, the beta logo came off the Google Web site. Since then Google has expanded its search technology into blogging, mapping, shopping, research and more. In fact, Google now has so many services it's hard to keep them straight. To help you get a grip on Google, our Google Services Quick Reference will highlight the many Google-branded services and provide links and references for each."
The webopedia product list still does not cover knol, orkut or youtube. May be it does not cover many more. It already emphasized the difficulty with the statement "Google now has so many services it's hard to keep them straight".               
________________________________________________________________________________________

Organization of Google Management

Operating Committee
Key executives by function:
Engineering
Products
Sales
Legal
  • Kent Walker, Vice President & General Counsel
  • David Lawee, Vice President, Corporate Development
  • Megan Smith, Vice President, New Business Development, and General Manager, Google.org
Finance
Business Operations
Google.org
  • Megan Smith, Vice President, New Business Development, and General Manager, Google.org
_______________________________________________________________________________________ 

Comments on  the Organization Structure of Google

Google is using a functional organization structure. In this structure, the market does not see the key persons behind the product. Obviously the top four or five persons are not attached to any product. People down the line are not given appropriate weight by the market and market runs them down also more easily.
Lack of visible product champions, which other start ups have, is probably making things difficult for google products in the market.
Who is the product champion of Orkut?
Who is the product champion of Knol?
Who is the product champion of Nexus One?
The public does not know. May be it is better that google reorganizes its management structure on product basis and makes the head of the product organization responsible for success of the product. Then he is there in public all the time to promote the product, to launch offensive actiity to promote the product and to defend the product in market competitive propaganda.
An alternative could be setting up of subsidiary companies for various product categories. This will create an entrepreneurial spirit among the personnel associated with each company as their future is now linked with the performance of the subsidiary and their incomes depend on the success of the products of their subsidiary company. They cannot depend on google's search success to mask their failures in market place.
An interesting observation was made by Thomas R. Eisenmann, an associate professor at the Harvard Business School. “Google needs to make sure that its management culture is in sync with the strategy,”  “I’m not sure the bottom-up approach will do it.”    
As we observe google products closely, we feel absence of product champions and product ambassadors is hurting the market performance. Google products are to be led  with a product CEO standing in front all the time in the market battle field.

______________________________
Does Google Need Managers


49.49 minutes



______________________________
What is your analysis?
Write in Comments.

___________________________________________________________________________________________

Related Knols


Google Social Mail

________________________________________________________________________________________

Related Web Pages

January 5th, 2010, Google needs its own Telco service not a phone, Posted by Tom Foremski
January 4, 2010, Five New Year's resolutions for Google by Tom Krazit
http://news.cnet.com/8301-30684_3-10423524-265.html
June 19th, 2008, Google needs to rethink its customer service strategy Posted by Garett Rogers
January 2007, Should Google Stick to the Knitting or See What Works?
November, 2000, Interview with Google's Sergey Brin
Original Knol - Number 2132

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

How Are You Making This World Place? MBA Challenge Competition March 2012



As persons interested in taking up careers, professions, and setting up firms in Business sector of the economy, think of your contribution to the society, economy and world.

How are you making this world a better place through student projects, start-up enterprises, and new careers?

Submit a video demonstrating how your work is making an impact in the developing world and how the MBA experience helped make it a reality.

http://www.gbsnonline.org/opportunities/contests/2012-mba-challenge-video-competition.html